Using select pale malt, cereal grains and yeast, this naturally hopped beer features premium taste, but not at a premium price.
1.1
812 reviews
Milwaukee, United States
Community reviews
5.0I personally find the taste extremelly well and have drank Milwaukee beer for years, athough others would say that they would never drink it, they always do and find it to have a great taste. I have had problems finding the Premium now, The Lagar has a heavier taste. Would perfer the Orginal than the Lagar.
1.9Pours yellow bubbly with a small head, aroma of grain, corn, metal, flavor of grain, metal, sweetness, bitterness, light bodied
1.4Aluminum can from Rite-Aid: Appeared a light golden liquid that was dimmer than most other macro pale lagers and had a tiny foam head that fizzed out quickly. Aroma is sweet grains, oats, corn flakes and perhaps rice. The flavor was bland with nothing more than a taste of malt liquor like malts used with an alcoholic taste of cheap beer. Reminds me of a step up from Natural Ice or Keystone light.
0.9Played a drinking game with a group of friends the other night, and the losers had to chug a can of Milwaukee’s Best Premium. I now see why it was the loser’s drink.
Heavily sour and unpleasant, not to mention diluted to hell. Once you get to the last few sips, it tastes like flat, unfiltered sewer water. It had a weird after-taste, somewhat akin to piss. Second worst beer I’ve ever had.
But hey, it’s a great drink if you’re dirt-poor and desperate for anything with alcohol content. Good for parties if you hate your friends.
3.3Poured from a 16 OZ can into a pint glass. The appearance is a pale light golden color with a small white head. The aroma is all grain. The taste is grain and corn with some mild carbonation. If you are going to power-drink this should be the beer you choice to do it with.
2.6Weak yellow appearance but a fairly decent head. Aroma is not bad... a bit corny and sweet, but not below average. Tastes like corn-flavored water, but not funky or "off" in any way. Very smooth, palate a bit light. All in all, quite neutral.. decent selection.
1.4Aroma: malty.
Appearance: clear straw/golden color and white head.
Taste: close to the water, malty, very low bitterness, semi-sweet.
Palate: low body and low carbonation.
Overall: I have never tried such a watery beer before.
1.2"I have had worse beer but can not remember when. The beast is deserving of that nickname the taste alone is pretty bad. But who amongst us hasnt had a good time with it?
1.7I have to rate this because it was a gift. Big white lasting white head. Sour aroma. Light on the palate. Don’t like the flavor but didn’t spit it out. This was a little bit better than expected.
0.9Pee pee yellow tons of carbonation thin white head. Taste metallic like a Tecate. The metallic killed it nt even thirst quenching.
1.3Beer. A little skunky, a little metal can..a beer for sure. Nothing special nothing terrible.
1.5Clear medium yellow. Dissipating white head. Sweet but not the sweetest. Nothing offensive really. Less cardboard than many similar beers. Not a good beer, but there are much worse.
1.1Can. light yellow with a white head. Straw and brewing cereal. Same flavors, dry finish. Nothing off putting but nothing good.
0.5밀러 브루어리 - 밀워키 베스트 프리미엄 비어 3.2% ABV 바이블 벨트 지역인 오클라호마주는 금주법 시대때 부터 이어져 온 법으로 인해 리쿼스토어나 바가아닌 곳의 맥주들은 3.2%도수를 넘기면 안된다고 한다
덕분에 가격은 싸지만 취기보다 두통이 먼저 찾아온다. 아무맛도 없어 레몬 때려 박고 마심. 알콜기라는게 이렇게 맥주맛의 중요한 부분을 차지한다는 점은 배울만
노먼, 오클라호마, 미국
https://twitter.com/MaekJuBot
4.1This is not a beer where one needs to develop a taste. It is a very good basic American Lager.
3.0Pours a very clear straw color. I have perhaps a two finger head. Doesn’t last long. Leaves thin film of head. Some lacing on the glass.
Aroma is slightly dirty. Smells of lightly roasted malt and grains. There’s also some wet cardboard.
Taste is pretty neutral. It’s sweet. It’s well carbonated. The grain really comes out in this. The sweetness and carbonation and the grain is really odd. There’s some hop bitterness at the end.
Mouthfeel is quite watery. It’s smooth. It’s pretty clean to the palate. It’s very drinkable.
Overall, it’s pretty good. I do take exception with the low ABV, I think it should be a little higher than this. It’s not as tasty as Budweiser, or Coors. But it is quite good. I’d certainly buy it again.
1.8Pretty good for a cheap beer. Not as smooth as MGD or Bud - this one tends to be a bit coarse.. You get what you pay for after all.
4.5Milwaukee’s Best, f*ck the rest. repeat as necessary. a straight ahead american brew. none of this trendy craft beer rubbish. Aroma, who cares! and tell me someone actually knows the difference between taste and palate, please spare me your pretensions.
2.0Minimal foam, sweet corn, barley and malts. Overall, pretty good (but definetely not GREAT) and drinkable.
2.3Can sample at a tasting at troubles’s place. Thanks troubles. Clear light gold with a white head. A little corny and paper aroma, sweet, papery and cooked vegetables taste. Fizzy, light-bodied, sweetish and a little corny finish.
2.2Can 0,35ltr: Clear golden colored brew with an very mediocre taste. Its a decent thirstquencher, give me an regular Miller/
1.9Can sample at a tasting at troubles’s place. Thanks troubles. Clear golden with a white head. Grainy aroma, kinda corny. Sweetish corny flavor, rather bland. Light-bodied. Could be worse.
1.6Can. Pours a pale yellow with quickly dissipating white head. Minimal aroma, a bit of corn. Thin and watery. A bit of bite up front from the carbonation. Seems even lighter than Miller Lite. Too carbonated. This was my beer of choice 25 years ago. I think that was mostly due to the price point. Now I find it barely resembles beer. It’s not offensive though and I will try and enjoy the 24 can that a friend gave me as a joke.
1.0The best thing I can say is that this is now knocked off my list. It has little taste or flavor, which is nice sometimes when you don’t want to taste or think while you drink.
2.0This could be Hamm’s, Schaefer, or Schlitz. Miller makes several American lagers that are indistinguishable. Buy the cheapest one if its a style you like. It’s not remarkable in any way: little aroma, a generic sweet malty flavor, light body, short finish, and tolerable but certainly not a great brew.
1.0Thanks, Shane, for bringing this back from your "hashing." Clear light amber with a decent 1" white head that reduces quickly to the rim. Not bad looking. Taste is something else - malt and rice aren’t nice, too much carbonation, and a medium finish featuring water. Surprisingly weak.
4.6for a commercially brewed beer this rates high on my list , the thing it needs is a little more malt & hop flavor . maybe a little more citrus like palisades . it finishes clean with a tinny aftertaste. its overall flavor is great if you like beer
1.012 oz. can that I stole from my Uncle Mel’s fridge as a tribute. Pale yellowish-orange pour with a fizzy, quickly diminishing, white head. Aroma of light grains, yeast, and faint citrus. Taste is watery with light cereal grains (i.e. corn and wheat), faint Earthy hops, and damp pale malt. I’ll give this a total score of "1", just like the #1 Grandpa mug my uncle would always drink this from.
0.5"A passion in quality shows in every beer we brew. It’s about making something you can take pride it" - Frederick Miller.
0.8355 ml can. Clear light golden with white head. Smell is light grain and corn. Taste is light sweet that dissappears quickly. Light sweet with no bitterness and fizzy carbonation. Pointless beer.