Wonderful fruity, malty notes accompany a mellow middle palate. A clean aftertaste.
1.9
201 reviews
Lidcombe, Australia
Community reviews
2.2Very faint aroma of sweet malts. Flavour is similar with some grains and mild grass. Crisp finish. It is okay in the summer.
3.8I use to love these 10 to 15 years ago. Gone off them, feel they changed the product. A summer beer.
1.7Keg. Clear gold with a slight effervescence and a small but lasting and even lacing white head. It’s an industrial pale lager. Need I say more? Slaked the thirst though on a warm afternoon in Clare after the trip from Sydney.
1.4[backlog] 04-01-15 // bottle in Sydney, Australia. Clear golden beer. Sweet malty. Grains. Not good.
2.8Tap. Amber, off-white lace. Sweetish bisquitty aroma, light grassy hops, leaves a light grainy aftertaste. Medium Light body. Not offensive.
1.9Sulphur nose, and malt once cleared. Watery, stale flavour and generally unremarkable in every way. A bit like drinking mineral water off a dusty bookshelf. Easy to drink without noticing, which is good because you wouldn’t otherwise. Super faint almond flavour, but you could just eat almonds instead so why bother?
2.5Bought at Carrefour in New Taipei County. Very, very feint malt on the nose. Golden in colour and nicely carbonated. Super light taste but in a good way. Light citrus and malty edge. Very clean finish. Good summer beer. I have to say though I prefer Tooheys New.
1.8Simple easy drinking beer doesn’t taste like much. Not very satisfying but nice and simple when cold.
2.6Pale golden colour with little head. Malty sweet with little hop and grain. Light body.
2.9As it says "clean crisp taste" moderately bitter, very crisp and subtle sweetness about it. Bold flavours combine to create a very well rounded dry beer.
2.0On tap. Pours pale yellow. No particular aroma. Mostly sweet taste, a bit crisp, quite dry indeed. Lacks hops and bitterness, a bit watery.
2.0696ml bottle into glass. Slightly skunk nose. Amber with big white head. Looks OK. Spritzy, a little bubblegum sweetness. Really abrupt finish with tiny suggestion of hops. No aftertaste so you immediately want another. Not very good, but not horrible either.
2.1Bottle. Pours clear light golden. Very clear. Little aroma to pick up on, cant detect hops. meh.
2.2Bottle from an Australian themed UK pub chain. Colour is pale gold not much head visable as from bottle. Aroma was had just a touch more than water. Taste is light malt and a bit of sweetness.
3.1Stale aroma. Clear golden colour with no head retention. Nicely balanced for a mass produced beer, but still watery. Medium body and carbonation. Blah ...
2.0345 mil bottle no real aroma light yellow no read head in clear bottle taste is very bland
2.1Tap. Light body, clear, golden, white foam, lightly bitter, average carbonation, & bitter finish.
1.7It’s not amazing but sadly the best thing on offer quite often, overly gassy and bland, is quite crisp on the palate. Must be drunk cold or you won’t bother to finish it.
1.8Pretty close to lightly flavoured water. Tough to taste the hops. Maybe a bit of lime. But not much. Very crisp. Gassy. Not a great finish. Would have to be a hot day to drink.
2.9Clear gold with off white head. Fruity nose. Some caramel and biscuit notes. Medium bodied crisp clean finish.
2.0Ins Glas ergießt sich ein goldgelbes Bier mit geringer Schaumkrone. Geruch leicht malzig, muffig, getreidig. Geschmack wässrig malzig, getreidig.
1.9345 ml bottle @ Aussie Bar, Tampere. Pours a clear golden colour with a white head. Aroma of grains and some very mild citrus. Flavour is very clean with mild maltiness, sweetness and mild citrusy notes. Some mild cardboard notes. Light bodied, high carbonation and thin mouthfeel. Mild and unoffensive, but pretty dull.
1.1OLD NOTES OCT 14, 2003
A particularly offensive brew. Chemically in a way that is not emulated by any other beer. Very highly carbonationed. Tastes of cardboard and Clag paste. Avoid.
0.9whoa, new depths. somehow this brew reminds me in smell and taste of burnt fireworks. Cant exactly pin it down except to say that’s what comes to mind. To go much further is pointless.
0.8Another cane sugar brewed beer marginally better than Carlton Cold. More drinkable but can’t consume any more than about 3 of these, also avoid.
0.6Total and utter shit. Not as bad as xxxx gold.. but close. Save ya money, dont buy this swill. you’ll thank me.
1.2Extra dry, no flavour at all. Lots of bready malt flavours, no hop character.
1.7Smells like metal. Tastes like crap. One of the worst beers I've had. The only redeeming feature of it was that it wet and I was thirsty.
1.1Three points overall because the beer feels clean. In every other aspect watery.
2.4A very dry, easy to drink beer with a subtle flavour. Quite crisp and is very refreshing on a hot day.